auréHAL for authors, research organisations, journals, scientific fields, and funders (ANR, european projects);
The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) describe how data should be organised to be more easily accessible, understood, exchangeable and reusable.
The increasing availability of online resources implies that the platforms that host them implement protocols and standards so that, today as tomorrow, humans and machines can exploit them.
Standards and protocols | ||
---|---|---|
Findable | - Each deposited file is described with rich metadata (bibliographic metadata, author’s affiliation, ANR or European projects metadata) - Metadata of each deposit are assigned a HAL identifier which is unique and persistent - Metadata are indexed in a searchable resource - The access is open and free | URI, Dublin Core, TEI, RDF, Sparql |
Accessible | - Metadata are accessible via open standards and protocols - Metadata are accessible via open APIs (no prior registration), OAI-PMH and in a triplestore - The contents of the documents are available in open and free access - Data are stored in a secure environment (IN2P3 Computing Center) and accessible via open protocols - Documents are sent to the CINES to preserve their long term accessibility and readability | OAI-PMH, API, RDF Triplestore, OAIS |
Interoperable | - Use of identifiers: DOI, PMID, SWHid, arxivid (see also Identifiers used in HAL) - Alignment with idRef, ORCID, ROR, RNSR - Vocabularies: DC, RDF, FOAF, SKOS, BILBO, Fabio | |
Reusable | - Metadata is distributed under a CC0 license - A distribution license is added for the publications deposited in HAL - General terms of use (in progress) |
Plan S is a set of principles that ensure open and immediate access to funded research publications, launched by cOAlition S in 2018. All funders who join cOAlition S commit to aligning their OA policies with Plan S.
Open archives must comply with a set of recommendations and requirements in order to fully guarantee this open access (see Plan S Principles and Implementation).
The following is a self-assessment of HAL against the Plan S requirements for Open Access Repositories.
Plan S criteria |
| |
---|---|---|
The repository must be registered in the Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR) | ✅ | |
Use of PIDs for the deposited versions of the publications (with versioning, for example in case of revisions), such as DOI (preferable), URN, or Handle. | ✅ |
|
High-quality article-level metadata in a standard interoperable non-proprietary format, under a CC0 public domain dedication. This must include information on the DOI (or other PIDs) both of the original publication and the deposited version, on the version deposited (AAM/VoR), and on the Open Access status and the license of the deposited version. Metadata must include complete and reliable information on funding provided by cOAlition S funders (including as a minimum the name of the funder and the grant number/identifier). | ✅ |
|
Machine-readable information on the Open Access status and the license embedded in the article, in a standard non-proprietary format. | ✅ |
|
Continuous availability (uptime at least 99.7%, not taking into account scheduled downtime for maintenance or upgrades). | ✅ |
|
Helpdesk: as a minimum, an email address (functional mailbox) has to be provided; a response time of no more than one business day must be ensured. | ✅ |
|
Plan S criteria | HAL compliance | |
---|---|---|
Manuscript submission system that supports both individual author uploads and bulk uploads of manuscripts (AAM or VoR) by publishers. | ✅ |
|
Support for PIDs for authors (e.g., ORCID), funders, funding programmes and grants, institutions, and other relevant entities. | ✅ |
|
Open API to allow others (including machines) to access the content | ✅ |
|
OpenAIRE compliance of the metadata | ✅ |
|
Quality assurance processes to link full-text deposits with authoritative bibliographic metadata from third-party systems, e.g., PubMed, Crossref, or SCOPUS where feasible. | ✅ |
|